Wednesday, August 04, 2004
/rolleyes
Found this site through Davezilla today, and stumbled up on this amazing revelation:
If you add up the name 'George Bush' in Hebrew letters it comes out:* G = 3 (gimel)I would challenge anyone to find another powerful world leader, either now or in the past, whose name adds up to 666 in Hebrew.
* e = 5 (heh)
* o = 70 (ayin)
* r = 200 (resh)
* g = 3 (gimel)
* e = 5 (heh)
* B = 2 (beth)
* u = 70 (ayin)
* s = 300 (shin)
* h = 8 (cheth)
* total = 666 (Antichrist)
Wow, he's got us there. This is some incredibly powerful damning evidence. I mean, I can't think of anyone who was another powerful world leader, in the past, whose name might also...wait, wait...now that I think of it, maybe...
GEORGE BUSH (SR.)
I swear, debunking crazy people is so easy that it's not even really all that fun.
Comments:
<< Home
Well, this guy, if not a loon, is certainly stretching quite a bit. However, I have read that the Pope actually *does* think that GWB could be the Anti-Christ. That must have made for some awkward moments at the audience the two had! ;)
I have two further points of interest to add (found your site through Dooce, btw). First, this guy is picking convenient, yet incorrect letters to transliterate from the hebrew (for example, the 'o's should be "vav"=6, not "ain"=70), which screws the math up.
Further, George Bush, phonetically and correctly, would be spelled in hebrew as follows:
g (gimel=3)
o (vav=6)
r (resh=200)
g (gimel=3)
b (bet=2)
o (vav=6)(functions as both U and O sound)
sh (shin=300)
which adds up not to 666 but to 520. I never thought I'd come to the defense of Dubya, but this is a terrible case of misappropriation of a rather beautiful tradition.
Thanks for that link!
Post a Comment
Further, George Bush, phonetically and correctly, would be spelled in hebrew as follows:
g (gimel=3)
o (vav=6)
r (resh=200)
g (gimel=3)
b (bet=2)
o (vav=6)(functions as both U and O sound)
sh (shin=300)
which adds up not to 666 but to 520. I never thought I'd come to the defense of Dubya, but this is a terrible case of misappropriation of a rather beautiful tradition.
Thanks for that link!
<< Home
